Tough Argument on a Tender Question

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Tough Argument on a Tender Question.

Editorial correspondence should be addressed to SCIENCE, 1515 Massachusetts Ave., NW Washington 5, D.C. Manuscripts should be typed with double spacing and submitted in duplicate. rhe AAAS assumes no responsibility for the safety of manuscripts. Opinions expressed by authors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the AAAS or the institutions with which the authors are affi...

متن کامل

Tough and tender: embodied categorization of gender.

Emerging evidence has shown that human thought can be embodied within physical sensations and actions. Indeed, abstract concepts such as morality, time, and interpersonal warmth can be based on metaphors that are grounded in bodily experiences (e.g., physical temperature can signal interpersonal warmth). We hypothesized that social-category knowledge is similarly embodied, and we tested this hy...

متن کامل

Tough complementation and the extraclausal propagation of argument descriptions

• none of the classical arguments for treating for Mary in John is easy for Mary to please as a PP are borne out by the full set of relevant data; • there is a set of arguments which point unequivocally to clausal status for for Mary to please; • this analysis however requires that the content description of tough predicates have access to the index specifications of the clausal subject Mary. S...

متن کامل

Question and Answering System based on Predicate-Argument Matching

This paper presents a Question and Answering system based on predicate-argument matching. Predicate-argument structures are utilized to capture more semantics in questions than a set of keywords. In addition to the predicate-argument matching, relation type matching is also used to handle expressions which are not mediated by verbs.

متن کامل

Does the Ontological Argument Beg the Question?

1. God exists in the understanding. 2. God might have existed in reality (God is a possible being). 3. If something exists only in the understanding and might have existed in reality, then it might have been greater than it is. 4. Suppose God exists only in the understanding. 5. God might have been greater than he is. 6. God is a being than which a greater is possible. 7. The being than which n...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Science

سال: 1962

ISSN: 0036-8075,1095-9203

DOI: 10.1126/science.135.3499.173